10-02-2006, 12:15 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 653
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
From another newsgroup:
"Bush is not a Conservative because
he lacks the traditional Conservative values: small, unobtrusive
government, fiscal responsibility (no deficit spending, balanced
budgets, lower taxes), strong military, strong belief in individual
rights, reluctance to change things, etc. Not that he's a Liberal
either. He's something else, something sinister masquerading as a
Conservative. The quicker he and his ilk are gone, the better."
|
10-02-2006, 01:34 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 72
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
In article <4ns2i25sqlbascab2mla1gr1ceft091h3r@4ax.com>,
Stuart Krivis <jd@mongo.krivis.com> wrote:
Quote:
|
From another newsgroup: "Bush is not a Conservative because he lacks the traditional Conservative values: small, unobtrusive government, fiscal responsibility (no deficit spending, balanced budgets, lower taxes), strong military, strong belief in individual rights, reluctance to change things, etc. Not that he's a Liberal either. He's something else, something sinister masquerading as a Conservative. The quicker he and his ilk are gone, the better."
|
I'm gonna vote again for him in 08. Go GWB!! A great president, one of
the best in the last 100 years.
--
|
10-02-2006, 01:43 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,609
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
Stuart Krivis, 10/2/2006,4:15:39 PM, wrote:
What other newsgroup? I'd like to know the source of this opinion.
|
10-02-2006, 01:57 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:34:55 GMT, dbu <howardyno@jackass.com> wrote:
Quote:
In article <4ns2i25sqlbascab2mla1gr1ceft091h3r@4ax.com>, Stuart Krivis <jd@mongo.krivis.com> wrote:
Quote:
|
From another newsgroup: "Bush is not a Conservative because he lacks the traditional Conservative values: small, unobtrusive government, fiscal responsibility (no deficit spending, balanced budgets, lower taxes), strong military, strong belief in individual rights, reluctance to change things, etc. Not that he's a Liberal either. He's something else, something sinister masquerading as a Conservative. The quicker he and his ilk are gone, the better."
|
I'm gonna vote again for him in 08. Go GWB!! A great president, one ofthe best in the last 100 years.
|
As courtesy to the rest of the group - perhaps you were looking for on
of the following news groups to post all your off topic stuff:
alt.radio.talk.dr-laura
alt.stupid.morons
alt.stupid.idiots
alt.stupid.signature.flame.flame.flame
alt.off-topic
In any case your "OT" rants are not appreciated here.
"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength."
|
10-02-2006, 02:24 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 72
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
In article <5n23i2d9dkpof1i70ofi341j7ora6ohkah@4ax.com>,
A Troll <t555hssdrw@nothingon.net> wrote:
Quote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:34:55 GMT, dbu <howardyno@jackass.com> wrote:
Quote:
In article <4ns2i25sqlbascab2mla1gr1ceft091h3r@4ax.com>, Stuart Krivis <jd@mongo.krivis.com> wrote:
Quote:
|
From another newsgroup: "Bush is not a Conservative because he lacks the traditional Conservative values: small, unobtrusive government, fiscal responsibility (no deficit spending, balanced budgets, lower taxes), strong military, strong belief in individual rights, reluctance to change things, etc. Not that he's a Liberal either. He's something else, something sinister masquerading as a Conservative. The quicker he and his ilk are gone, the better."
|
I'm gonna vote again for him in 08. Go GWB!! A great president, one ofthe best in the last 100 years.
|
As courtesy to the rest of the group - perhaps you were looking for on of the following news groups to post all your off topic stuff: alt.radio.talk.dr-laura alt.stupid.morons alt.stupid.idiots alt.stupid.signature.flame.flame.flame alt.off-topic In any case your "OT" rants are not appreciated here. "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength."
|
I just killfiled you, how does that grab ya?
--
|
10-02-2006, 03:02 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 95
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
dbu wrote:
Quote:
In article <4ns2i25sqlbascab2mla1gr1ceft091h3r@4ax.com>, Stuart Krivis <jd@mongo.krivis.com> wrote:
Quote:
|
From another newsgroup:"Bush is not a Conservative becausehe lacks the traditional Conservative values: small, unobtrusivegovernment, fiscal responsibility (no deficit spending, balancedbudgets, lower taxes), strong military, strong belief in individualrights, reluctance to change things, etc. Not that he's a Liberaleither. He's something else, something sinister masquerading as aConservative. The quicker he and his ilk are gone, the better."
|
I'm gonna vote again for him in 08. Go GWB!! A great president, one of the best in the last 100 years.
|
Thank goodness that can't happen.
|
10-02-2006, 03:13 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 72
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
In article <vUgUg.8405$vJ2.2446@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>,
Carroll Boardway <mcboard@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote:
dbu wrote:
Quote:
In article <4ns2i25sqlbascab2mla1gr1ceft091h3r@4ax.com>, Stuart Krivis <jd@mongo.krivis.com> wrote:
Quote:
|
From another newsgroup:"Bush is not a Conservative becausehe lacks the traditional Conservative values: small, unobtrusivegovernment, fiscal responsibility (no deficit spending, balancedbudgets, lower taxes), strong military, strong belief in individualrights, reluctance to change things, etc. Not that he's a Liberaleither. He's something else, something sinister masquerading as aConservative. The quicker he and his ilk are gone, the better."
|
I'm gonna vote again for him in 08. Go GWB!! A great president, one of the best in the last 100 years.
|
Thank goodness that can't happen.
|
Why are the dimmies still thinking he will?
--
|
10-02-2006, 07:15 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,370
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
"dbu" <howardyno@jackass.com> wrote in message
news:howardyno-48C4FA.18145402102006@news-rdr-02.rdc-kc.rr.com...
Quote:
In article <vUgUg.8405$vJ2.2446@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>, Carroll Boardway <mcboard@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote:
dbu wrote:
Quote:
|
In article <4ns2i25sqlbascab2mla1gr1ceft091h3r@4ax.com>, Stuart Krivis <jd@mongo.krivis.com> wrote:>From another newsgroup:>>>"Bush is not a Conservative because>he lacks the traditional Conservative values: small, unobtrusive>government, fiscal responsibility (no deficit spending, balanced>budgets, lower taxes), strong military, strong belief in individual>rights, reluctance to change things, etc. Not that he's a Liberal>either. He's something else, something sinister masquerading as a>Conservative. The quicker he and his ilk are gone, the better." I'm gonna vote again for him in 08. Go GWB!! A great president, one of the best in the last 100 years.
|
Thank goodness that can't happen.
|
Why are the dimmies still thinking he will? --
|
They keep wasting their efforts on hating Bush. Bush can't run again.
Period. Please note the 22d Amendment. Although they would love it if
Slick Willie would run for a third term. . .
Charles of Schaumburg
|
10-03-2006, 08:37 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
Carroll Boardway wrote:
Quote:
|
I'm gonna vote again for him in 08. Go GWB!! A great president, one of the best in the last 100 years. Thank goodness that can't happen.
|
Why do you say so? As far as I know he's now able to re-write
your constitution as he pleases.
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Oct-02-1.html
That said, now they can also consider non-allegiance to Bush
as terrorism. Sounds like Hitlers 'Enabling act' of 1933.
--
// Janne
|
10-03-2006, 09:01 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 72
|
|
{OT} What's GWB?
In article <TkwUg.25423$rY5.8722@reader1.news.jippii.net>,
Janne Karhunen <Janne.Karhunen@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Carroll Boardway wrote:
Quote:
|
I'm gonna vote again for him in 08. Go GWB!! A great president, one of the best in the last 100 years. Thank goodness that can't happen.
|
Why do you say so? As far as I know he's now able to re-write your constitution as he pleases. http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Oct-02-1.html That said, now they can also consider non-allegiance to Bush as terrorism. Sounds like Hitlers 'Enabling act' of 1933.
|
More political hay into the silo, hitler, bush ect ect ect. Horses and
bulls eat it and it's called B.S. and H.S., comes out the other end to
renew the earth and then the whole process starts all over again. It's
election time, LOL!!
--
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
|
